• Share

Google + Search Operator: Lost and Nowhere to Be Found

Google Search Operator

For the average user, Google is a treasure trove of numerous things waiting to be uncovered and learned. However, for the adept user, it’s a superhighway of information. If you know the right keys to use and the right keywords to punch in, you can easily find what you are looking for.

What makes searches on Google more powerful aren’t the searches alone, but using the right operators or syntaxes. For example, have you ever used the “+” sign while searching in Google before? It was one of the oldest search operators in Google and was used the first time the site was up and running.

If you haven’t tried using the “+” sign while searching or haven’t heard about it at all, then you have missed out on one of the simplest yet most powerful conventions in Google. Yes, there used to be a Google + search operator, which came in way earlier than Google+ (the social network.) The syntax has been available since the start of Google.

How the Google + Search Operator Works

The search operator was simply used by typing the plus (+) sign before the phrase or words that you were looking for. Basically, its purpose was when you wanted to search for a word or a phrase and want the results with the exact words or phrases. Because Google likes to match several terms (often unrelated to your search) to your searches, the + operator was very helpful because it only gave you what you needed in the results. Today, if you type in the + sign before the words or phrase you are searching, Google will automatically ignore it right away.

How to Restrict Searches Today

So, without the + operator, how do you restrict your results to whatever it is that you want? To do so, now you have to put a quotation mark before and after the term to make sure that Google matches the word precisely. While that’s also easy to do, more and more power-users are complaining because of course, typing the + sign before or in between the words is definitely easier than using quotation marks.

This change was made without any announcement. In fact, users were just shocked to find out eventually that the + operator no longer worked at all. Because there was no announcement, no reasons were given as to why the change was made.

Why Did Google Remove the + Search Operator?

Once again, because Google made no announcement on such change, no reasons were given. Hence, we can only speculate. Many users say that its because of the new Google+ Social network. Perhaps, Google does not want the + search operator to be confused with Google+ especially now that the site uses the + sign to mention friend’s names, quite similar to the @ mention syntax of Facebook or @ reply syntax of Twitter. Continuing either would probably create conflict, and with the growing popularity of Google+, they may have decided to let go of the former.

Considering that the + operator was one convention that was there ever since the start of Google in 1997, numerous power users are sad to see its demise. After all, it has been used by many Google power-uses to make their searches easier to do. Unfortunately, its doom was inevitable, given the fact that the need for Google+ profile searching and replying would have to come first.

  • http://www.seopositiveltd.co.uk/reputation-management.php Samara

    I really like the concept of this post and I feel that this is a very unique and rare information that you have managed to compile. It is quite interesting to read about this very rare topic.Thanks for all the information.

  • http://www.barcodefor.us barcode software

    Thanks for informative post. I did not had idea that we can search with quotation marks instead of + operator.

  • myatlanta rental

    A well written page, very informative one. Atlanta Property Management

  • 237080915

    jingrui   jyj According louis vuitton outlets  to the England

    that publishs here today ” China business signs up for ” report, china is famous civilian louis vuitton outlets stores  battalion enterprise China is accused

    by the one employee before the name for louis vuitton outlets store

    online  British branch Chinese of give special treatment, carry out the colour bar to British employee. Na Anpu

    pauses the labor arbitrates front courtyard passes appraise sth through discussion, the practice be good law that

    ruling China was a few days ago asks,  louis vuitton outlets

    online alleged ” citizen of discrimination England mainland ” do not hold water. On November 14,

    arbitrate in a labor of the Anpudu austral England on front courtyard careful, an employee that dismisses points to

    China for inequity. This is called Pete’s employee, came 2006 suffer between 2009 hire Yu Ying national China is,

    take up the post of a client to serve an engineer, was dismissed in May 2009.  authentic louis vuitton outlets He claims: “Come 3 years of 2009

    from 2007, the ” after Hua Weixian fries ” employee of 49 this locality, but neither one is a Chinese. There are 342

    Chinese to send British China by China during this to work. ” Pete thinks China violated British louis vuitton 2012  Home Office for this kind of practice the

    regulation about foreign labor and native citizen treat equally without discrimination. China the data that to

    rejoining middle finger skin provides especially is completely incorrect. China for in financial louis vuitton outlet  crisis had had a few times 2009 cut down the

    member of persons employed, cut down the  louis vuitton wallets  

    British employee of 25% and the Chinese employee of 32% . 2009 China for in all employ 342 employee, among them 70%  

    louis vuitton speedy  recruit in British this locality. And the

    law that the program that cut down the member of louis vuitton

    outlets  persons employed accords with England completely. The labor arbitrates front courtyard is

    maintained finally China for repulsive Pitegeli lawful, the accusation of citizen of mainland of alleged

    discrimination England does not hold gucci outlets  water.

  • Mustafa94015

    google very big market in the world we must except this and very thanks to you to this informations..

  • http://www.furore-internetmarketing.nl/hoog-in-google/ Hoog in Google

    I’m really curious whether Google + will become an serious competitor of Facebook and Twitter. I guess they will! 2012 is the year of truth for Google!

blog comments powered by Disqus